Case study · Not for profit · Two dedicated AP resources

64.5% reduction in employment cost for AP team while processing 280+ invoices every week

Reduction in annual AP team employment cost
64.5%
Invoices processed every week
280+
Dedicated AP resources
2
Cost centres, every invoice allocated correctly
37

A large not for profit organisation cut annual AP team employment costs by 64.5% with two dedicated resources while fixing late supplier payments and processing 280+ invoices every week.

Client
A large and diverse not for profit organisation operating across multiple sites in Australia, with education, community services and other agencies.
Industry
Not for profit
Team
Two dedicated AP resources
Systems
Zudello and Microsoft Dynamics GP
Scope
Accounts payable, invoice processing, cost centre review, supplier management, payment runs and AP process documentation.

Our client

A complex AP function across 37 cost centres

A large and diverse not for profit organisation operating across multiple sites in Australia, with education, community services and other agencies.

Its accounts payable function was complex, with 37 cost centres, two invoice processing systems and a high volume of supplier invoices. The client wanted more structure, timely supplier payments and lower AP team costs.

The challenges

What was breaking before Business Avengers

  1. ▪Supplier payments were often delayed, leading to regular follow-ups and strained supplier relationships.
  2. ▪Delayed payments sometimes triggered account suspension notices, putting important services at risk.
  3. ▪37 cost centres made it critical to allocate every invoice correctly.
  4. ▪Many invoices lacked the property address or contact person needed to identify the right cost centre.
  5. ▪Confusion over which entity should pay each expense, and whether to process it through Zudello or Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  6. ▪Many AP activities depended on individual knowledge, with few documented procedures.

The solution

Two dedicated resources and one structured process

We reviewed the existing AP workflow and identified where it could be improved.

Two dedicated resources then took over the day-to-day AP function.

  1. ▪A structured approach to identify the correct cost centre across all 37 cost centres.
  2. ▪Supplier engagement so invoices carry the property address or relevant contact person.
  3. ▪A clear process to identify the responsible entity and choose between Zudello and Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  4. ▪A consistent process for receiving, reviewing, processing and posting invoices.
  5. ▪Documented procedures for the AP inbox, invoice processing, cost centre review, payment runs, supplier setup, Zudello synchronisation and supplier queries.

The result

Timely payments at 64.5% lower cost

The client now has a dedicated AP team processing 280+ invoices every week, at 64.5% lower annual AP team employment costs.

Supplier payments are more timely and supplier follow-ups have reduced. Cost centre allocation is also more accurate.

Key AP activities are documented and repeatable. Management has greater control over invoice processing, supplier management and payment runs.

The AP function has moved from reactive to structured.

Frequently asked questions

What was the main problem in the client’s accounts payable process?
Late supplier payments, invoices that did not carry enough information to allocate them to the right cost centre, and processes that relied on individual knowledge rather than documented procedures.
How do you make sure every invoice goes to the right cost centre?
We put a structured approach in place across all 37 cost centres. We also worked with suppliers so their invoices carry the property address or relevant contact person. Where it was unclear which entity should pay, a clear process now decides the entity and the system the invoice goes through.
Can you work inside the AP systems we already use?
Yes. For this client, the team worked across their two existing systems, Zudello and Microsoft Dynamics GP. We are software agnostic and work in the systems our clients already have, including Xero, MYOB, NetSuite, SAP, Oracle and QuickBooks.
What happens to our supplier payments and relationships?
Supplier payments became more timely and supplier follow-ups reduced. Before, late payments had sometimes triggered account suspension notices that put important services at risk.
What if our AP process depends on one or two people?
That was the case here. We documented the procedures for the AP inbox, invoice processing, cost centre review, payment runs, supplier setup, system synchronisation and supplier queries. The process no longer relies on individual knowledge.
What was the impact on the organisation?
Accounts payable became structured and controlled instead of reactive, with more timely payments, fewer supplier follow-ups and a 64.5% reduction in annual AP team employment costs.
How quickly can we get started?
Teams are typically up and running in 24 to 48 hours. Every engagement can begin with our 45-day risk-free trial.
Share
Next case study →A $800,000 in-house finance function, halved in nine months

Want results like these for your finance function?

Dilip Kherajani